Voyou Désœuvré

I thought this week’s episode of Mad Men was one of the weakest the show has ever done – this season has often been a bit obvious, but this episode went beyond that to be genuinely clunky: the heavy handedness of the episode’s insistence that prostitution is bad (a simplicity which undermines the show’s previous, much more interesting, awareness of the way in which, for women in the 60s, all choices were bad choices); the strange insistence on presenting Don as a “good” person; the blindingly obvious parallels between Joan’s storyline, the ad campaign they are working on, and the subplot involving Megan. So I’m annoyed by this post, which praises the episode for all the things that make it clumsy, in the service of a moralizing critique of capitalism which, because it ties that moralism to women’s bodies, also manages to be sexist. The key line, regarding the supposed ethical superiority of Don and Peggy:

They are free to act ethically because they are not trying to find a way to belong, and they understand themselves as having nothing to lose…. Thus, they are not simply good capitalist subjects in the fashion that, say, Pete Campbell is. They are ambitious in wanting to work the system but also understand the impossibility of obtaining the object that would provide complete inclusion.

That is, they make an ethical choice to resist being “included” in the capitalist system. But capitalism isn’t something you can get outside of, and certainly not by making an individual ethical choice. Worse, this ethics of purity in relation to capitalism is explained, in the post, in terms of prostitution and the episode’s rather boring dilemma as to whether Joan should prostitute herself; the logic of the argument in the post amounts to an ethical embrace of a sexualized purity, or, in other words, calling Joan a whore.

But by restricting consideration to individual ethics, that post also misses the one interesting thing about the episode: that when Don goes to Joan’s house to dissuade her from sleeping with a client (an action, BTW, which makes no sense at all in terms of Don’s characterization), he completely fails to understand what is at stake for Joan. Joan has always been aware of the way being a women exposes her to insecurity, and also of the ways in which in might be possible to use her femininity to mitigate this – in the case of this episode, getting some kind of legal ownership in the company. The post’s claim that Joan “doesn’t have a choice” again sells her short – she does have a choice, and although it’s a very bad set of options, she is aware of the necessity of navigating these options strategically.

As we have seen in previous episodes with Don’s relationship with Megan (particularly the episode where he left her stranded at a motorway service station), Don really does not understand this position of dependence that sexism has forced women into, still less his own role in perpetuating that. It will be interesting to see how Megan deals with this dependence, and whether Don is capable of reassessing his own position; if, at least, the rest of the season manages to be better than this episode.

(And, the more I think about it, the more troubled I am by the Peggy plot. Although of course it’s the culmination of a lot of development for Peggy, within this episode her decision to leave the company does look a bit like she’s had her head turned because a charming man paid attention to her; as a matter of her appetites getting in the way of a proper loyalty to Don – consider her longing look at the lobster she doesn’t get to eat early in the episode.)

Comments

  1. voyou (Voyou Désœuvré), 12:05 am, May 31, 2012

    On a very bad blog post about a pretty bad episode of Mad Men: http://t.co/F6REQNNa

  2. amypoodle, 6:19 am, May 31, 2012

    Don isn’t presented as a good person at all. He’s presented as a man displacing all his anxieties about his g/f’s acting career onto another woman. To Megan he’s just a possessive prick, but to Joan he’s a white knight – all he can do is piss Megan off, but Joan he can save. Joan experiences him as a good person because she doesn’t know his motivation and because she’s an old fashioned gal who wants to believe in the fairytale heroes (see Greg), but we don’t. Don may or may not understand what’s at stake for Joan, but that’s not the point – the point is he doesn’t care. It’s all about him.

    And, fair enough, you might not like the parallel narratives shared by Joan and Megan, but this device is hardly new to Mad Men. And the reason Don’s pitch echoes their dilemmas is for the simple reason that it’s entirely informed by them. I don’t really see the problem there, either.

  3. Spoiler Alert Thursday: Mad Men, The Other Woman « An und für sich, 8:22 am, May 31, 2012

    […] found myself far more in agreement with voyou’s take on the most recent episode, than with the one in […]

  4. NathanCoombs (Nathan Coombs), 10:57 am, May 31, 2012

    The problem with the new season of #madmen http://t.co/g92IajI0

  5. Mindless Ones » Blog Archive » Mindless Mad Men #10 – The Other Woman, 1:54 pm, May 31, 2012

    […] Volume: Yeah, that sequence was very carefully modulated – it was “on the nose” in the way that people apparently complain about now, what with Don seeming to sell the idea of […]

  6. voyou, 3:31 pm, May 31, 2012

    Thanks, amypoodle; Don displacing his anxieties does make his visit to Joan’s apartment comprehensible, and also makes me see his relationship to Megan in a somewhat different light. I don’t object to the parallel construction in principle, and that construction can make you see both elements of the parallel in new ways, but if the parallels are too close, it can seem heavyhanded, like they’re just repeating the plot in case you didn’t get it the first time. Now that you’ve made me rethink both the Joan/Don and Megan/Don aspects of the episode, I’ll have to have a think about whether there’s more going on in the parallel than I saw on first viewing.

Post a comment