<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glamor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.voyou.org/2009/06/14/glamor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2009/06/14/glamor/</link>
	<description>Lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawaii bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2009/06/14/glamor/comment-page-1/#comment-51813</link>
		<dc:creator>hawaii bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voyou.org/?p=682#comment-51813</guid>
		<description>aloha BEAUTIFUL Miss HALL should b kissed with passion on a very regular basis. incredable thick allureing lips mahalo aloha hb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aloha BEAUTIFUL Miss HALL should b kissed with passion on a very regular basis. incredable thick allureing lips mahalo aloha hb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anodyne lite</title>
		<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2009/06/14/glamor/comment-page-1/#comment-36655</link>
		<dc:creator>anodyne lite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voyou.org/?p=682#comment-36655</guid>
		<description>Good point about Hall and Hume. They do seem to have a sort of middle class, next-door neighborly relatability that many other Fox anchors lack. Hume is also well-known as the voice of reason, their one anchor who isn&#039;t willing to just play along with Fox&#039;s special blend of pure spectacle with opinion journalism. Hall lends an aura of &quot;maybe we have conservative career women viewers whom we shouldn&#039;t alienate entirely&quot; credibility to an otherwise very retrograde network. Kimberly Guilfoyle (in overly-made up appearance and performance) really struck one as the sort of woman who could just as easily be playing a lawyer in porn flick set in a courtroom, where Hall could be your Halle Barry-lookalike professor or colleague.

When it comes to celebrity in the UK, I&#039;ve always wondered if maybe stardom broke down earlier thanks to a couple of factors: their market is smaller and therefore easier to crack (example: Katie Price)-- leading to a proliferation of minor and over-visible celebrities--and they have a much more vicious tabloid culture, which loves to feature horrifyingly &#039;real&#039; shots focusing on, e.g., the pit-stains of starlets like Kate Winslet, compared to US tabloids, which tend to airbrush the hell out of even &quot;candid&quot; People Magazine shots of minor celebrities like Tori Spelling. Tabloids here are good PR, in the UK they often mean the end of your credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about Hall and Hume. They do seem to have a sort of middle class, next-door neighborly relatability that many other Fox anchors lack. Hume is also well-known as the voice of reason, their one anchor who isn&#8217;t willing to just play along with Fox&#8217;s special blend of pure spectacle with opinion journalism. Hall lends an aura of &#8220;maybe we have conservative career women viewers whom we shouldn&#8217;t alienate entirely&#8221; credibility to an otherwise very retrograde network. Kimberly Guilfoyle (in overly-made up appearance and performance) really struck one as the sort of woman who could just as easily be playing a lawyer in porn flick set in a courtroom, where Hall could be your Halle Barry-lookalike professor or colleague.</p>
<p>When it comes to celebrity in the UK, I&#8217;ve always wondered if maybe stardom broke down earlier thanks to a couple of factors: their market is smaller and therefore easier to crack (example: Katie Price)&#8211; leading to a proliferation of minor and over-visible celebrities&#8211;and they have a much more vicious tabloid culture, which loves to feature horrifyingly &#8216;real&#8217; shots focusing on, e.g., the pit-stains of starlets like Kate Winslet, compared to US tabloids, which tend to airbrush the hell out of even &#8220;candid&#8221; People Magazine shots of minor celebrities like Tori Spelling. Tabloids here are good PR, in the UK they often mean the end of your credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

