<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No hope for the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.voyou.org/2009/03/11/no-hope-for-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2009/03/11/no-hope-for-the-future/</link>
	<description>Lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: voyou</title>
		<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2009/03/11/no-hope-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-34032</link>
		<dc:creator>voyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voyou.org/?p=575#comment-34032</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m not opposed to capitalism being saved by Keynesianism - if I&#039;d had a vote in the US, I might have been tempted to cast a write in for &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.voyou.org/?attachment_id=581&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the reanimated corpse of Roosevelt&lt;/a&gt;. But I&#039;m not sure Keynesian solutions are possible now, for both economic and political reasons. One of the papers at this conference was about how the Home Guard fostered a kind of utopian collectivism that was important in the post-war construction of the welfare state. That is, 20th century Keynesianism took a lot of political effort to construct, and I think a contemporary Keynesianism might take as much effort; and anyway, Keynesianism itself might not work given the different economic constraints of globalization, informatized production and stuff. So I don&#039;t know that Keynesianism actually is a realistic alternative to communism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m not opposed to capitalism being saved by Keynesianism &#8211; if I&#8217;d had a vote in the US, I might have been tempted to cast a write in for <a href="http://blog.voyou.org/?attachment_id=581" rel="nofollow">the reanimated corpse of Roosevelt</a>. But I&#8217;m not sure Keynesian solutions are possible now, for both economic and political reasons. One of the papers at this conference was about how the Home Guard fostered a kind of utopian collectivism that was important in the post-war construction of the welfare state. That is, 20th century Keynesianism took a lot of political effort to construct, and I think a contemporary Keynesianism might take as much effort; and anyway, Keynesianism itself might not work given the different economic constraints of globalization, informatized production and stuff. So I don&#8217;t know that Keynesianism actually is a realistic alternative to communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2009/03/11/no-hope-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33855</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voyou.org/?p=575#comment-33855</guid>
		<description>I support rescuing capitalism through Keynsianism this time. I don&#039;t think we have enough of a left for anything else. The BNP are probably going to benefit far more from any discontent with the system than any of the left groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support rescuing capitalism through Keynsianism this time. I don&#8217;t think we have enough of a left for anything else. The BNP are probably going to benefit far more from any discontent with the system than any of the left groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

