http://blog.voyou.org/2008/10/01/socialism-is-when-you-nationalize-the-banks-without-compensation/ Lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:01:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blog.voyou.org/2008/10/01/socialism-is-when-you-nationalize-the-banks-without-compensation/comment-page-1/#comment-48530 Nationalisatie: zodat alles bij het oude blijft | Grenzeloos Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:31:21 +0000 http://blog.voyou.org/?p=378#comment-48530 [...] betekent dat banken zonder compensatie genationaliseerd worden’, schreef iemand op een blog. Dat is romantisch maar er zit een kern van waarheid in. Dat links nu gelijk heeft gekregen dat het [...] [...] betekent dat banken zonder compensatie genationaliseerd worden’, schreef iemand op een blog. Dat is romantisch maar er zit een kern van waarheid in. Dat links nu gelijk heeft gekregen dat het [...]

]]> http://blog.voyou.org/2008/10/01/socialism-is-when-you-nationalize-the-banks-without-compensation/comment-page-1/#comment-32325 on the left side….. » Blog Archive » Change: Finanzkapitalismus Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:56:13 +0000 http://blog.voyou.org/?p=378#comment-32325 [...] das ist, wenn Banken ohne Kompensation nationalisiert werden, schreibt voyou in seinem Blog. Das ist romantisch, aber hat eine Wahrheit. Und dass die Linke mit ihrer [...] [...] das ist, wenn Banken ohne Kompensation nationalisiert werden, schreibt voyou in seinem Blog. Das ist romantisch, aber hat eine Wahrheit. Und dass die Linke mit ihrer [...]

]]> http://blog.voyou.org/2008/10/01/socialism-is-when-you-nationalize-the-banks-without-compensation/comment-page-1/#comment-32324 geo Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:25:44 +0000 http://blog.voyou.org/?p=378#comment-32324 man, i effing love lou dobbs. did you notice (of course you did) that capitalism and profit were eliminated from that story? if you force the banks to loan to the poor, it MEANS they will do so in a shitty way. and this is embodied in the foucaultian creation of a new category of person (which literally appeared in large letters on the screen): the "subprime borrower." no, it's not the LOANS that are subprime, its the BORROWERS! man, i effing love lou dobbs. did you notice (of course you did) that capitalism and profit were eliminated from that story? if you force the banks to loan to the poor, it MEANS they will do so in a shitty way. and this is embodied in the foucaultian creation of a new category of person (which literally appeared in large letters on the screen): the “subprime borrower.” no, it’s not the LOANS that are subprime, its the BORROWERS!

]]>