Comments on: The idiocy of ego psy­chology http://blog.voyou.org/2007/06/03/the-idiocy-of-ego-psychology/ Lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:01:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ishi http://blog.voyou.org/2007/06/03/the-idiocy-of-ego-psychology/comment-page-1/#comment-50504 ishi Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:47:47 +0000 http://blog.voyou.org/2007/06/03/the-idiocy-of-ego-psychology/#comment-50504 i heard a theory in the 40's held that swaddling babies---in russia, for the cold i guesss---explained stalinism. pampers pretty much ushered in utopian market democracy or neoliberalism, possibly with a transition period a la Marx from cloth diapers to the current late period of capitalism in which its all good. i note the profound identification of 'symbolization' as the precursor for technological materialism post-nautral-ism. reminds me of john zerzan (language and number are the root of all evil) who reminds me of rousseau (yes, but its a neccesary evil----count on it, i got 5 on you). its funny all these intellectuals arguing (typically for a living) that writing and math are morally wrong and joyless bullshit. (as an aside, the only issues i have with boring social science books is they are commonly as redundant, innovative, original, and oevres d'art as an all new calculus book or standard econ text or perhaps shaum's outline series. one might need a regression analyses to show the entropy of such books is primarily due to their being identical particles (bose statistics) and as Boltzmann suggested without evolving entropy towards heat death of the uiverse there'd be no time, free market optimization, jobs, or human rights (eg right to be lazy).)) The signifiers must condense eventually yielding the phase transitions we all know and love (to hate). i heard a theory in the 40′s held that swaddling babies—in russia, for the cold i guesss—explained stalinism. pampers pretty much ushered in utopian market democracy or neoliberalism, possibly with a transition period a la Marx from cloth diapers to the current late period of capitalism in which its all good.

i note the profound identification of ‘symbolization’ as the precursor for technological materialism post-nautral-ism. reminds me of john zerzan (language and number are the root of all evil) who reminds me of rousseau (yes, but its a neccesary evil—-count on it, i got 5 on you). its funny all these intellectuals arguing (typically for a living) that writing and math are morally wrong and joyless bullshit.

(as an aside, the only issues i have with boring social science books is they are commonly as redundant, innovative, original, and oevres d’art as an all new calculus book or standard econ text or perhaps shaum’s outline series.

one might need a regression analyses to show the entropy of such books is primarily due to their being identical particles (bose statistics) and as Boltzmann suggested without evolving entropy towards heat death of the uiverse there’d be no time, free market optimization, jobs, or human rights (eg right to be lazy).)) The signifiers must condense eventually yielding the phase transitions we all know and love (to hate).

]]>