<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britain&#8217;s stu­pidest public in­tel­lec­tual (with bonus St Au­gus­tine content)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.voyou.org/2007/01/15/britains-stupidest-public-intellectual-with-bonus-st-augustine-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2007/01/15/britains-stupidest-public-intellectual-with-bonus-st-augustine-content/</link>
	<description>Lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bat020</title>
		<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2007/01/15/britains-stupidest-public-intellectual-with-bonus-st-augustine-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>bat020</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voyou.org/2007/01/15/britains-stupidest-public-intellectual-with-bonus-st-augustine-content/#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>I suspect TJ&#039;s argument is about &quot;Jesus&#039;s teachings&quot; than &quot;mainstream Christianity&quot; tho. Giles Fraser made similar points in a rather bizarre piece we printed in SW recently - a distinction between &quot;Christianity&quot; v &quot;Christendom&quot; and a claim that secularism is compatible with the latter. File under interesting bollox, if y&#039;ask me.




http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=10347
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect TJ&#8217;s argument is about &#8220;Jesus&#8217;s teachings&#8221; than &#8220;mainstream Christianity&#8221; tho. Giles Fraser made similar points in a rather bizarre piece we printed in SW recently &#8211; a distinction between &#8220;Christianity&#8221; v &#8220;Christendom&#8221; and a claim that secularism is compatible with the latter. File under interesting bollox, if y&#8217;ask me.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=10347" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=10347</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

