<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can&#8217;t even un­der­stand the lyrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.voyou.org/2006/10/28/you-cant-even-understand-the-lyrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2006/10/28/you-cant-even-understand-the-lyrics/</link>
	<description>Lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: voyou</title>
		<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2006/10/28/you-cant-even-understand-the-lyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>voyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voyou.org/2006/10/28/you-cant-even-understand-the-lyrics/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, you&#039;re right. The last couple of chapters of &lt;em&gt;One Dimensional Man&lt;/em&gt; do actually go some way to addressing my complaint with the stuff about a technology of values; and there is that part in the Culture Industry chapter where they complain that people prefer Donald Duck to Betty Boop.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Still, although I haven&#039;t thought about this enough to be sure, I have a feeling that the Frankfurt types have a theoretical inclination which is more consistent with their mode of critique as lament than with an investigation of new possibilities; the connection of art with the master&#039;s inability to act (in the Odysseus analogy in particular) makes it hard for me to see an actual positive theory of the political value of art in Adorno and Horkheimer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you&#8217;re right. The last couple of chapters of <em>One Dimensional Man</em> do actually go some way to addressing my complaint with the stuff about a technology of values; and there is that part in the Culture Industry chapter where they complain that people prefer Donald Duck to Betty Boop.</p>
<p>Still, although I haven&#8217;t thought about this enough to be sure, I have a feeling that the Frankfurt types have a theoretical inclination which is more consistent with their mode of critique as lament than with an investigation of new possibilities; the connection of art with the master&#8217;s inability to act (in the Odysseus analogy in particular) makes it hard for me to see an actual positive theory of the political value of art in Adorno and Horkheimer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://blog.voyou.org/2006/10/28/you-cant-even-understand-the-lyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voyou.org/2006/10/28/you-cant-even-understand-the-lyrics/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>This is pertinent but pretty unfair for the Frankfurters as a whole.  You &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; find stuff like that in Marcuse- but you can also find all manner of affirmations of new technology and popcult- there&#039;s an especially fine passage in Counter-Revolution and Revolt about why dance music is more revolutionary than hippy stadium rock, and &#039;The Affirmative Character of Culture&#039; shares a bent towards the possibilities of mass culture more similar to Benjamin than Adorno.  And Teddy himself is always at the risk of caricature here too I think: you could set against the One Dimensional Man passage you quote here something from Adorno&#039;s essay on Brave New World, where he points out how the sterile sexuality that so horrifies Huxley is actually really very alluring if you don&#039;t share his back-to-nature bent.  Incidentally have you read this? (scroll down) &lt;a href=&quot;http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/essays/2003/01/critone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/essays/2003/01/critone/&lt;/a&gt;  not sure how successful it is, but interesting nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pertinent but pretty unfair for the Frankfurters as a whole.  You <em>can</em> find stuff like that in Marcuse- but you can also find all manner of affirmations of new technology and popcult- there&#8217;s an especially fine passage in Counter-Revolution and Revolt about why dance music is more revolutionary than hippy stadium rock, and &#8216;The Affirmative Character of Culture&#8217; shares a bent towards the possibilities of mass culture more similar to Benjamin than Adorno.  And Teddy himself is always at the risk of caricature here too I think: you could set against the One Dimensional Man passage you quote here something from Adorno&#8217;s essay on Brave New World, where he points out how the sterile sexuality that so horrifies Huxley is actually really very alluring if you don&#8217;t share his back-to-nature bent.  Incidentally have you read this? (scroll down) <a href="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/essays/2003/01/critone/" rel="nofollow">http://freakytrigger.co.uk/old-ft/essays/2003/01/critone/</a>  not sure how successful it is, but interesting nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
